Dear Ms Evanovich -I hope you are well. As I understand it, there was a story in the media earlier this year that suggested (perhaps erroneously) that your agent had sought on your behalf the sum of $40 million for your next four books. It was with great excitement, therefore, that I opened your latest novel, WICKED APPETITE, which I presumed would provide me with roughly $10 million worth of humorous crime / mystery japery.
It would appear, however, that I accidentally received an ARC copy that has had all the jokes taken out, perhaps because your publishers fear some humourless and pedantic plagiarist such as myself might steal said jokes and use them for himself. Would it be possible to get a copy of the novel with all the jokes put back in, please? Or maybe just one joke per chapter, if that’s not risking too much.
I did, I must confess, enjoy your one running gag of having your characters only ever ‘roll’ or ‘cut’ their eyes at one another, on the basis (presumably) that your heroine is a pastry chef, and spends a considerable amount of time ‘cutting’ and / or ‘rolling’ the various ingredients for her delicious cakes and pies. I did find it intensely irritating at first, of course, but I soon realised that no self-respecting author would so limit themselves so without good reason, and very quickly made the ‘pastry chef’ leap. My only concern is that those readers of yours who lack my appreciation of your subtle wit might not make the same leap as quickly, but I suppose you know best.
Finally, I’m a little worried that your keyboard is playing up, because it appears to omit the word ‘of’ at crucial moments - for example, ‘a couple muffins’, ‘a couple cupcakes’, ‘a couple stones’, etc. I counted at least 15 examples of this omission, which might irritate readers who are even more pedantic than I. May I make a humble suggestion? If your keyboard is not capable of writing the word ‘of’, simply substitute ‘two’ (if you mean ‘two muffins’) or ‘a few’ (if you mean ‘a few muffins’) instead of ‘a couple of’. It’s a small thing, I know, but some readers may believe you’re trying out a meaningless stylistic tic that is so infuriating it prompts them to run out and buy every copy of WICKED APPETITE they can find in order to build a proper bonfire, and I’d hate for you to think that it was because some humourless pedants believe that WICKED APPETITE is bland rubbish.
Yours sincerely,
Declan Burke
10 comments:
Laughing so hard I can't see. Thank you for this, Mr. B.
Brilliant!!
The David Spade of crime fiction reviewing! Good job.
True story: I downloaded an audiobook of the latest Janet E book for my better half for a 19 hour flight to Italy. She had listened to Ms E in the past and liked her stuff when driving in the car etc.
I asked her how the latest one was when she got back and she told me that she had listened to twenty minutes and turned it off. She said that she would rather spend 18hours staring at the seat back in front of her than listening to that keek.
Oh, you are a one! Hilarious!
I saw a punk band once called Bland Rubbish. They weren't really punk, though, some of them were previously in a prog rock band called Humourless Pedants.
Ouch, harsh. That said, I normally love Evanivich's books, but this one, well, sometime around chapter 9 I finally gave it up. Definitely not up to par.
I've liked the numbered ones in the past, but even there I do get tired of the Ranger...no, Morelli...no, Ranger...no, Morelli dilemma. She's used that one a couple times too many. Uh, I mean two times too many.
Pedants unite...I enjoy the SP books, I must say, but hate, hate, hate it when Ms. E writes "I should of done xx" instead of "I should have done xx." I get that "should've" sounds like should of...but srsly??
Couple beers there please!
LOL...
T.S.
Post a Comment